The M2 neckpiece is designed in the computational environment by algorithmic generation and is materialized by 3d printing ABS plastic. The fine web structures are generated by parametric variation and are 3d printed into a positive mold that is used in a state-of-the-art silver casting technique. The GRID MUTATION collection explores the jewellery adornment quality and tests the connection between parametric design and the potential of digital fabrication methods. Material: 925 silver – grained glossy finish The C2 pendant is designed in the computational environment by algorithmic generation and is materialized by 3d printing in resin and casted in silver. Thus, diffuse structures are obtained, which rely on transparency, gradients, overlaps and reflections to remind the form they come from. The Sequence collection translates into the physical environment the virtual algorithmic process of formal generation that is implied into the materialized jewellery. Silver-casted from 3D printed moulds, hand-finished – non-uniform glossy appearance ģd printed black ABS plastic – mat fine finish We have two types of endpieces available: Material: Transparent plexiglass - coloured un one side - 3mm thick Adding a colour gradient over the soft geometry enhance the formal variation. The shape is obtained by the fluid deformation of a square section through flattening, rotation and elongation processes to generate a symmetrical shape. Not sure if in the end this post is a better argument for buying a mac or for choosing a windows machine instead, but hopefully it's at least a little bit informative.The L1_d gradient neckpiece is algorithmically generated in the digital environment and is materialized by stringing together variable laser cut two-dimensional sections. All the features are pretty much there, but the interface is clunky as hell and painful to use. So, while I wouldn't recommend you hold your breath waiting for the mac version of GH, if you want a mac don't let that hold you back.Īlso just FYI mac rhino 5.0 is, in my humble opinion, an extremely poor substitute for the real thing. (the magsafe power cord has saved my life more times than I can count.) The high cost of apple products is not just due to the software integration and mac snob factor the machines have genuinely high-quality hardware, and there's no discounting the industrial design quality. This may be my personal (lifelong) apple bias speaking, but I think that my mac running windows is actually the best, most reliable windows machine I've ever owned. Yes, on one hand I am switching fairly often, and it's quite possible that I actually run windows more of the time than mac OS, but it's really not that big a deal. I have bootcamp set up with windows 7 on my MacBook Pro and couldn't be happier. Should I just buy a PC (for half the price) and wait another 2-3 years to buy a Mac, assuming that there will be a grasshopper for mac by then?Īdvice on your experiences are appreciated, thanks. I've seen discussions going back to 2009 about grasshopper beta for OSX, but David has said all resorces are put on the Rhino 5 release so they havent concentrated on the OSX version yet. Are you constantly switching OSX and Windows, having to save files and then move into the other platform or how do you make it worth while for the hastle? I'm wondering how anyone with a mac uses grasshopper. I would hate to spend so much money on a mac and basically have it running windows all the time. I use grasshopper nearly all the time in my designs, rarely a project without grasshopper, so Im worried it may be annoying switching between boot-camp and parallels or something whenever I want to run rhino with grasshopper. I'm looking into new computers to buy for gradschool, and I'm all set to switch to a Mac, but the ONLY thing keeping me from it currently is the current inability to use grasshopper in OSX.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |